Impact & VisionCore USP

Domain-Agnostic Boundary

AIJIM's protocol model is domain-agnostic. The current reference implementation still carries journalism-tuned quality heuristics that must be profile-isolated before a broad domain-agnostic product claim.

Current truth

AIJIM is not just a journalism tool. The protocol invariants, bundle model, verifier contract, human gates, and fail-closed semantics are domain-neutral. The current reference implementation, however, still includes some journalism-profile quality heuristics in Core/App/Copilot code. Those are honest profile-isolation work, not a second protocol.

Closed

T.1 runtime proof

Real producer output, verifier PASS, and sentence-level provenance are already anchored on the current runtime line.

Advanced

T.3 adversarial substrate

The repo and verifier stack now support multi-axis adversarial probe disclosure and measured fail-closed results.

Evidence

T.4 domain proof

A second serious-domain line can exercise the same contract family. That is evidence for the protocol architecture, not yet a blanket claim that every implementation heuristic is profile-agnostic.

Implementation frontier

The protocol claim and the implementation claim are separate. Before a broad external claim of full product-level domain agnosticism, the journalism-tuned framing patterns, lead-ordering heuristics, and role-vocabulary defaults must either move into a journalism profile or remain explicitly scoped as reference-implementation heuristics.

Candidate domains

Investigative journalism

Live proof case

Runtime path, publication, export, and verifier flow are exercised here today.

Medical review

Serious candidate domain

High-stakes evidence interpretation and human review fit the invariants cleanly.

Compliance and audit

Serious candidate domain

Structured evidence, gates, replay, and attestable publication outputs map directly.

Due diligence and M&A

Serious candidate domain

Claim chains over documents and explicit sign-off authority match the current protocol.