AIJIM PROTOOLS
ScienceThresholds

T.1–T.4 Threshold Status

The honest scientific-threshold state of AIJIM after the 1.0 runtime closure and the first post-closure synthesis pass.

Boundary

This page does not issue a brilliance pronouncement. It separates runtime-closed facts from the remaining scientific steps that still require user pronouncement or additional archived evidence.

Interpretation

T.1–T.4 are tracked together here for operational overview. Within the stronger domain-agnostic telos, T.1–T.4 all matter, but T.4 is the second-domain empirical threshold rather than a second formal theorem line.
T.1

Closed

Publication-bound provenance

Immutable publication identity, sentence-level provenance, verifier-ready export, and real runtime proof are already in place.

T.2

Pending user acceptance

Formal Lever-1 result

The repo now carries a sharper theorem-style draft, but closure still depends on user acceptance that the formal articulation is sufficient under the domain-agnostic telos.

T.3

Advanced

Adversarial empirical synthesis

One executed probe per axis family exists and the methods/results synthesis is now stronger, but closure still depends on user acceptance that the empirical substrate is sufficient for the orthogonality claim under stress.

T.4

Closed

Second-domain proof

A real science-domain case is now documented and now carries archived verifier-PASS evidence under the same contract family.

What changed in this pass

  • T.2 now has a stronger theorem-style draft rather than only a sketch memo.
  • T.3 now has a tighter methods/results synthesis over the three executed probe families.
  • T.4 now has both an explicit second-domain execution report and archived verifier-PASS evidence for the exact science case.
  • The remaining open items are narrower and more explicit than before.
T.2 next move

User-acceptance review of the formal draft and explicit challenge on the minimality and asymmetric-authority claims.

T.3 next move

Decide whether one probe per axis already supports user acceptance of orthogonality under stress, or whether each axis needs one more variant.

T.4 next move

Keep the archived PASS evidence attached to the exact science publication case and resist any drift into domain-specific verifier exceptions.